There seems to be a lot of conflicting or conflated information circulating about how to get an academic job in the Humanities. (I can never write that word without thinking of the Humani-Tee t-shirts with animals and rainbows on them that were so prevalent in certain Girl Scout groups in the 1990s.)
From what I’ve heard, it seems like 6 published articles and a book deal are your best hope for getting hired, but though they are necessary to get a job, they are not sufficient to keep it. With so many more people getting PhDs now, blah blah blah, you can read about the glut of doctoral degree earners elsewhere.
Today, I’d rather talk about how to survive the notion of “publish or perish,” a trope that has been with academia since at least 1966 (based on that link to The New Yorker).
Phase #1: Aspiring young scholars should know what they’re getting in to. Be wary of publishing scams from China and Libertyville, Illinois. Try to get published through conference connections and legit publications, some calls for which can be found here. I usually only ever find one conference in Hawai’i annually, but it never hurts to continue the search in other places if that’s your bag. You might be surprised (but hopefully not!) at how often calls for papers / publications / proposals (CFPs) align with your research. Conferences can be great places to meet people researching in your field, network your way into a publication or someone’s good graces, and score free coffee.
Here’s a sneaky pro tip for getting your presentation accepted at a conference: use the CFP buzz words or conference name in your proposal. For example, I really really really really really wanted to attend GRIDLOCK because it sounded so perfectly suited to my dissertation research (about cultural cartography – and maps are often on grids!), so I titled my presentation “Off the Grid with Santa Claus and Superman: Mapping ‘The [True] North’ in Canadian and American Literature, Popular Culture, and Cartography.” This is not only pretty spot-on as far as my research focus for the talk, but – as you may have noticed – it also used the word “grid” AND it has been selected for inclusion in the conference! *victory lap*
a) Open access! I hate when there is a compellingly titled article and it’s not digitized or the library doesn’t have permissions or there is some other hang up. It is so annoying. One solution for this would be for people to stop using good titles (don’t!). Another option is to digitize everything. A third option is to force everyone to submit to on-line journals. Until one, some, or all of these things happen, you should still try to submit to a traditional, established, organization-affiliated, professional, usually printed, journal
b) Some journals have you submit three (or more) printed paper copies for review. While I understand that this saves on paper for the editorial review board, I am a pretty big fan of “track changes,” and I am not a super huge fan of killing a tree for each journal submission. A solution is to include your SASE, but if your paper is not accepted, you likely have to make some revisions, so having your old version in triplicate doesn’t really do you any good unless you chop up the blank sides and turn them into buttons. Say, that’s not the worst idea…
c) The odds for wider distribution could be higher on the Internet. Journal subscriptions available only through specific organizations could be seen as a narrow and limiting way to distribute your ideas. That being said, that particular organization is probably going to find the audience that is most interested in — and liable to read — your publication. Plus, it’s the system we have for now, and to get a job you need to have good ideas, communicate them effectively, and get them published in a respected, established (likely, printed) journal.
Always remember: if at first you don’t succeed, revise and resubmit.
But seriously, folks, just do your best, contribute to The Scholarship, play nice with others, hope for the best, and never send money orders to China! Those rules can apply to most things. Best wishes for a long, happy, Long-Island-Iced-Tea-free career!
This message is brought to you by me and my opinions. Consult your peers, advisor(s), partner(s), family, and common sense for more (and perhaps even better) advice. My blog and its affiliates are in no way responsible for you or your associates doing anything rash. Likewise, this blog and its subsidiaries claim no blame should you or your associates choose to: (a) incur damages to life or limb; (b) disagree about how hilariously funny a post might be and incur damages to face, nose, or fist; (c) run over someone while you or s/he are reading this blog from a portable device while operating a motorized vehicle of any kind, including but not limited to Big Wheels and / or a tractor trailer; (e) get run over by someone while you and / or s/he is reading this blog from a portable device while s/he is operating a wheeled vehicle of any kind, including but not limited to
roller skates what is this the 1950s?, roller blades, one or more unicycles, a bicycle, a tricycle, a bicycle built for two, a velocipede, and / or a penny-farthing, heretowith not forcluding. In summation, if you sue we will flee to Canada where the coffees are smaller and the society is less litigious. This blog does constitute professional legal, judicial, or fiduciary advice. It does not promise to cure any diseases or ailments, including lack of wit, sarcastic inclination, employment, or humorous vapors. If you live in Canada you can see a doctor for free within 9-12 months about your various conditions.
Glad that’s out of the way.